Showing posts with the label counter-intelligence

A .eco-flout-able nurturing environment trait and feature - giving credence to the mundane and the humble, of the lives that nature provides us with - the Muskmallow.

 I’ve been a man of malleable resolution, over the past few days (as perhaps does happen at times): about the reliability and historical soundness and priory of information provided on Wikipedia, although the site is one of my primary go-to browsing | development platforms upon which reasonably viable data and workflow is provided. I’d been wrought up as a variable and, here and there, contentious figurative enterprise manager; in this instance, I’d come across Supervising Scientist - the job title, as something that I took on, as a novel affiliation. Enterprising, for studying, in depth, a (perhaps) simulated crisis, of a public health contingency, yet, inferentially, quite viable, given the context of that I’m lately coming home to a larger-than-expected garage’s-passing (along-the-way to going inside, to get to my room); the material I became compelled by, that I had on hand, which had gained in importance, for development (into “something;” various things, that it became: for my va

I’m a fan of tar. Some notable global [internet] destinations and products available pertaining to tar and resins production and research investigation.

I’m here and there drawn towards tar products, for their rich and flavorful scents. In our American youth (of this, and perhaps of leading-up generations), a propagandistic counter-intelligence slütel of a capricious hooker house made it’s bwopp couch-fuckin’ sprawl out upon our minds of that “tar” in cigarettes was some sort of negative connotation, against an assertion of that tobacco was being portrayed as pleasurable and sociable. These days, cigarette advertisements don’t seem all that common, and the Ad Council (or some sort of agency such as that), portrays a similar rebuke upon flavored tobacco and e-cigs; it’s a bit troubling to stomach, as an adult that I am, versus of that I had been introduced to tobacco use as an abuse victim, of a too-early age (according to the law), whereas I feel that I would have been statistically most likely to have achieved and excelled better, had I not been abused in that manner. The underlying psychology surrounding the circumstances is chronica